Sunday, February 20, 2011
Welcome Note Samples For Wedding Guests
Mocca gets into the debate progressivism-Peronism
After 125 and 2009 legislative defeat some allies began to doubt the model of Kirchner and imagined becoming a new horizon which should start
listed in the column "... had highlighted an important development potential for those who drove the return Peronism to "normal" after Kirchner experience which was considered definitely dead. "
With the apparent hegemony achieved from 2010, says Mocca "... the President does not owe its current dominant position in the PJ to a sudden attack of loyalty from those who were preparing to disembark, but the favorable turn of their electoral chances. "
From this danger aborted, ie, the Peronist party always tends to support who is likely to get the real power at which the debate is moving indoors, in within the ruling "... there are tensions between the currents more accurately Kirchner and those who, having returned to the fold, claiming electoral potential ..."
"Peronism is not, never was "highly institutionalized party, after the 2001 crisis has rather the appearance of a federation of district leaders nationally are ordered to the circumstances. That means it is not written anywhere that the struggle for national triumph is that you organize the board, in principle, each serving their game. "
worth mentioning that Peronism is not and never could have been institutionalized party because it was never a party. Peronism as a movement is beyond the party structure, as well as is possible to recognize a doctrine and an end in itself Peronist there are different ways of understanding how to achieve it.
What is the debate within the ruling?
"... focus is on the province of Buenos Aires. And revolves around enabling or not the meeting for Democracy and equity to nominate its leader for governor of the province, in a ballot that includes the national candidate Cristina Kirchner. The reasons for conflict are evident: both Scioli's candidacy as several mayors would probably suffer a decline in this format electoral constituency. That is why power is required to put on concepts and arguments. In this case the choice is the common interest of "Peronism" and the challenge of "progressivism."
"... funny is noted that the purity "Peronist" sum adherents among sectors that until recently were difficult to identify with the PJ. It is clear that in this space, many of which reference is part of the experience of Frepaso, Kirchner has managed to revive the legitimate feelings of belonging Peronist and is interpreted in terms of return to the historical sources of the movement. It is also understandable that the persistence of anti-Peronism in certain circles that nourish progressive strengthening of the Peronist identity. The term "progressive" also tends to obscure rather than clarify the meaning of political action: we see every day, "progressive" common cause with the big economic corporations in the systematic fight against the current national policy "
This issue was highly debated in the blogosphere. Is it wise to conceptualize as a liberal to all non-Peronist arc? is the same Pino Sabatella? who seems more Peronist Ghi Mussi or Lucas?
However, the rejection of partial alliance with the party of Sabbatella arguments usually sustained in confusing and sometimes contradictory. It is said For example, you need to ensure unity of Peronism to achieve re-election of Cristina Kirchner, is difficult to understand how Buenos Aires votes Sabbatella the ballot as a candidate to take Cristina conspire against the re-election. From other villages are said to Sabbatella relies on the good times and in bad criticism. He says a mayor who is not heard no definition at the time of Resolution 125, while the then mayor of Moron clearly militant in defense of the sliding tax. The "unity of Peronism" did not resist, at the time, the corporate pressures, migrated more than a few legislators with the card's PJ day and provincial leaders to Santa Fe and Cordoba, among others, became part of the already mentioned experience dissident Peronist.
"The issue is that few times in the last six decades had been given favorable circumstances for constructive dialogue between two popular political traditions such as the Peronist and left-inspired social gender. Both had their merits and historical limitations. The collided Peronist tradition-sometimes bloodily-with the limits of the right of the movement itself. The socialist tradition almost always stood against Peronism and the road was more than once aligned with the right. There to see if everyone manages to defend their legitimate aspirations without frustrating the possibility has been opened. "
In conclusion, ascribes to what many have stated above. This scenario is suitable to form a united front from different ways and from different positions with the goal of social justice, political sovereignty and economically. No impositions or orthodox purist, not this "frontage but we do not impose anything" repeatedly heard how a united front if the other side there is distrust and no place for critical consciousness?
The full story here : http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-162742-2011-02-20.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment